Publishing ethics

 
Publishing ethics
The BJGP supports the ethical principles set out by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). It is important that authors understand the need for the research undertaken to conform to the Helsinki declaration. You will normally have to confirm that the study has been approved by a named Research Ethics Committee to be considered for publication. In addition you must ensure that there is no risk of your being charged with duplicate publication. All authors of any kind of article submitted must declare any competing interests by completing a standard form, which will be sent to all authors at the conclusion of the peer review process. This should be returned with the revised manuscript. COPE has given guidance on the definition of competing interests: that they may influence the judgement of author, reviewers, and editors; that they may be personal, commercial, political, academic or financial. As a rough guide, they have been described as those which, when revealed later, would make a reasonable reader feel misled or deceived. In addition, all authors must declare that, where relevant, patient consent has been obtained and that all reasonable steps have been taken to maintain patient confidentiality.
 
'Salami' publication
Medical editors generally are concerned with the practice of generating numbers of related papers from the same study. This is not a matter of unethical behaviour, but concerns good publication practice. When considering whether to publish findings separately or together, authors might wish to consider the degree of overlap according to the following questions:
  • Is this the same, related or a completely different question?
  • Is it using the same or different methods to answer the question?
  • Is it assessing the same, overlapping or a completely different population of participants?
The BJGP supports a general policy of encouraging more complete publishing, i.e. combining findings into single papers rather than separating them into different papers. Where authors are considering how to present findings, they should discuss with the Editor the extent to which submitting a more complete report will require the word limit to be extended. In order to enable the Editor to make a judgement, authors should include with the submitted file, abstracts or full copies of other papers published, in press, submitted or planned, that have come from the same study.
 
Writers of letters and editorials must also declare competing interests. Steps are also taken to ensure that reviewers declare competing interests or, if there is a conflict and they feel it is appropriate, to decline to review a paper.
 
 
If you encounter a problem with this page please email the web team
© Royal College of General Practitioners 2008
Registered Charity Number - 223106