1 December 2006

Choice, contestability and competition - RCGP asks patients for their views

A public consultation on the issues surrounding contestability and competition in primary care is now being held by the Royal College of General Practitioners (RCGP).

 

The discussion paper ‘Choice, Contestability and Competition in General Practice Services’ is open to patients and healthcare practitioners and aims to identify the potential advantages and disadvantages of the policy on patient care.

 

Current NHS policy is aimed at increasing patient choice, access and quality by introducing competition (contestability) within the NHS, including the concept of contracting out services currently provided by NHS hospitals, and some community and primary care contractors.

 

Until recently the debate has focussed on the role of the private sector in secondary care, for example independent sector treatment centres. But now the debate needs to shift to implications for primary care as a significant proportion of Primary Care Trusts (PCTs) are expected to invite tenders for contracts from new entrants.

 

The consultation paper put forward by the RCGP Medical Ethics Committee examines the strengths and weaknesses of contestability and its impact on a range of factors such as the quality of care. The purpose of the consultation is to promote a structured debate about the advantages and disadvantages of a market approach on patient care.

 

Ailsa Donnelly, Chair of the RCGP Patient Partnership Group, says: “There has been very little public discussion around competition for NHS services so far and it’s vital that patients are consulted and have their say on the issues, as it is their health and well-being that is at stake.”

 

Dr Clare Gerada of the RCGP Medical Ethics Committee says: “Current policies advocating contestability, competition and choice raise important ethical questions such as how the NHS should organise primary care services so that they best meet the needs of patients.

 

“It’s difficult to predict the outcome of these policies and so it is right that we debate the advantages and disadvantages of such an approach. Whilst some commentators are concerned about new entrants such as large companies providing primary care services and the potential tensions posed by an obligation to shareholders, others welcome the competition that GP services are now exposed to and the resultant improvements in access and patient-centered services.”

 

The consultation paper is available online at http://www.rcgp.org.uk/. All comments must be submitted by Friday 12 January 2007.

 

Ends

 

Media enquiries: Please contact Lorna Fletcher in the RCGP Press Office on 020 7344 3136/3129 or press@rcgp.org.uk

 

NOTES TO EDITORS

The Royal College of General Practitioners is the largest membership organisation in the United Kingdom solely for GPs. It aims to encourage and maintain the highest standards of general medical practice and to act as the “voice” of GPs on issues concerned with education; training; research; and clinical standards. Founded in 1952, the RCGP has over 25,000 members who are committed to improving patient care, developing their own skills and promoting general practice as a discipline.

If you encounter a problem with this page please email the web team
© Royal College of General Practitioners 2008
Registered Charity Number - 223106