Written Paper - October 2006

Examiners' Comments

 
Question 10
 
Why was this question asked?

Respiratory infections make up a large part of a GPs workload. There is an increasing concern about antibiotic resistance as well as the potential side-effects with the widespread use of antibiotics. Recent evidence suggests that the risks of antibiotics in uncomplicated upper respiratory tract infections outweigh the benefits.

The partnership dynamics are changed when a new partner joins. If the new partner makes dogmatic and challenging statements life can be interesting!

 

What were the themes of the question?

The themes were the issues that this statement raised. There is a lot of evidence about the prescription of antibiotics in general practice. GPs have to do their best for each individual patient, they need to be flexible, considering the patient’s needs. One can only be sure that an infection is ’uncomplicated’ when it has resolved!

Why is the new doctor making such statements? Has she had a bad experience with the prescription of antibiotics? Does she have an attitude problem, or is she unhappy? Why is she so rigid? Is she trying to make her mark within the practice? Perhaps to let them know how she means to continue.

 

The patients may also be taken aback with such a rapid change of policy. If partners differ, there is the scope for one doctor to be played off, one against the other.

 

There are also huge issues for the other partners who may have an increased workload as patients cope with a rapid change of policy. GPs are not the only people who prescribe for patients. Nurse prescribers, A&E doctors & OOH doctors can all prescribe antibiotics.

 

How well was this question answered?

The performance overall was disappointing. Most candidates were aware of the issues for the existing doctors, their team, and patients but less aware of the issues for the new doctor. There was little mention of the evidence for antibiotic use in upper respiratory tract infections. Several candidates answered the question by using an ethical framework, without considering the other issues. This did not work well in this particular question.

 

Further reading

Sign guidelines- no 34 Antibiotics in sore throat

http://www.sign.ac.uk/

 

BMJ, doi:10.1136/bmj.38891.681215.AE (published 21 July 2006)

Are antibiotics effective for acute purulent rhinitis? Systematic review and meta-analysis of placebo controlled randomised trials

 

BMJ  2005;331:301-302 (6 August), doi:10.1136/bmj.331.7512.301

Delayed prescribing of antibiotics for upper respiratory tract infection BMJ 2004; 329: 431

Ineke Welschen, Marijke M Kuyvenhoven, Arno W Hoes, and Theo J M Vertract

Effectiveness of a multiple intervention to reduce antibiotic prescribing for respiratory tract symptoms in primary care: randomised controlled trial BMJ;1999,318:715-716 9 13 march)

 

An evidence based approach to reducing antibiotic use in children with acute otitis media: controlled before and after study Christopher Cates, general practitioner.

 

Manor View Practice, Bushey Health Centre, Bushey, Hertfordshire WD2 2NN

BMJ  2006;333:311-312 (12 August), doi:10.1136/bmj.333.7563.311

Antibiotics for urti & conjunctivitis

If you encounter a problem with this page please email the web team
© Royal College of General Practitioners
Registered Charity Number - 223106