John Gillies Blog

 

RCGP Opposes Health and Social Care Bill

07/02/12

John gillies june 2011

In my blog of 11 May 2011, I wrote about the worries of RCGP and English GPs concerning the Bill:

 

These are not about GP commissioning which is welcomed by many in the College, but about ensuring that the NHS continues to provide comprehensive care, free at the point of access. It calls for the issues of accountability, competition law, conflicts of interest, abolition of practice boundaries and fairness to be properly addressed. The revolutionary changes in education and training are regarded by RCGP as unwelcome and potentially harmful in primary care.

 

You will be aware of the news that, after a great deal of consideration and consultation with the membership, RCGP has decided to seek the withdrawal of the Health and Social Care Bill in England. You can read the full press release here.

 

The concerns remain very much as I set out last year despite much debate and many amendments in the House of Lords. It’s important to note that RCGP continues to support a greater role for GPs in the planning, design and delivery of services within their local communities.  The decision to seek the withdrawal is based on the potential of the Bill to increase fragmentation of care, jeopardise access to care for poor people and vulnerable groups, and to threaten the future of a unified NHS in England.

 

The situation is changing as I write, but currently the BMA, Royal College of Nursing, Royal College of Midwives, the Royal College of Radiologists and the Chartered Society of Physiotherapists oppose the Bill.  Other royal colleges are considering their position; very recently the Faculty of Public Health also announced their opposition. A recent BMJ (4 February 2012) published editorials and commentary on the reforms, including a defence of the Bill by Secretary of State, Andrew Lansley.

 

The Bill does not apply in Scotland, of course, where we face exactly the same financial and demographic challenges, but have, so far, a more evolutionary approach to NHS development.  It is still a place where the word ‘public’ is not thought to be bad, and where, as Iona Heath says, we maintain a communitarian approach to public life.

 

 

Revalidation arrives…

 

 

2012 is the year when revalidation, which has been in development for at least 10 years, finally gets underway. We discussed the process with Sir Peter Rubin, GMC President, when he was in Scotland last autumn. The plan is for it to be phased in over 3 years, by the end of which all doctors will have completed a revalidation cycle.  The process of selecting the doctors who will be first to be revalidated has been yet to be finalised.

 

In Scotland, we are fortunate in having a robust appraisal process, overseen by NHS Education Scotland, which has now been in existence for nearly 10 years. This means that most GPs should be well prepared for revalidation.

 

Currently, we are waiting for final guidance from the GMC on the precise requirements for revalidation. I am very grateful to Drs Ken Lawton and Sally Al- Agilly for their work on this. When we are clear about precisely what is required, RCGP Scotland will send out guidance to our members.

 

Events…

Finally, I would like to alert you to a couple of interesting events that are coming up. I will be speaking on 12 March at the first National Conference on Rural General Practice  about the implications for Scotland of the commissioning agenda in England.  Also a key event in the Scottish primary care calendar, takes place in Glasgow in April, the SSPC Annual Conference 2012. 

 

John